|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈练,刘强,张文明,等.添加植酸酶对米糠消化酶水解产物化学组成及理化性质的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(05):198-201.
 Chen Lian,et al.Effects of phytase on chemical composition and physico-chemical properties of rice bran enzymolysis products[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2015,43(05):198-201.
点击复制

添加植酸酶对米糠消化酶水解产物化学组成及理化性质的影响(PDF)
分享到:

《江苏农业科学》[ISSN:1002-1302/CN:32-1214/S]

卷:
第43卷
期数:
2015年05期
页码:
198-201
栏目:
畜牧兽医
出版日期:
2015-05-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of phytase on chemical composition and physico-chemical properties of rice bran enzymolysis products
作者:
陈练刘强张文明安亚南周定勇汪勇庄苏
南京农业大学动物科技学院,江苏南京 210095
Author(s):
Chen Lianet al
关键词:
米糠非淀粉多糖植酸蛋白质矿物元素
Keywords:
-
分类号:
S816.44
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
研究了植酸酶对米糠消化酶水解产物化学组成及理化性质的影响,并探究养分之间的相互作用。结果表明:植酸酶处理显著增加了米糠液相提取物(SE)的粗蛋白质(CP)和总非淀粉多糖(TNSP)含量(P<0.05),显著降低了SE的粗灰分(Ash)含量和不可溶剩余物(ISR)的CP、Ash含量(P<0.05)。植酸酶处理显著提高了SE的Ca、Mn、Zn、Cu含量和ISR的Zn含量(P<0.05),显著降低了SE的P、植酸磷含量和ISR的P含量(P<0.05)。添加植酸酶显著增加了SE各单糖含量、单糖总量和ISR的葡萄糖含量(P<0.05)。结果提示,植酸酶处理可提高米糠SE的溶解度、蛋白质含量和非淀粉多糖含量,降低其Ash和植酸含量;米糠中植酸和非淀粉多糖对矿物元素都具有较强的结合能力,它们之间的相互作用可能是导致米糠养分消化利用率较低的重要原因。
Abstract:
-

参考文献/References:

[1]Abdul-Hamid A,Luan Y S. Functional properties of dietary fibre prepared from defatted rice bran[J]. Food Chemistry,2000,68(1):15-19.
[2]Saunders R. Rice bran:composition and potential food uses[J]. Food Reviews International,1985,1(3):465-495.
[3]刘强. 我国麦类饲料中非淀粉多糖抗营养作用机理的研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院,1998:38-43.
[4]张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 3版. 北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007:48-81.
[5]Theander O,Aman P,Westerlund E,et al. Enzymatic and chemical analysis of dietary fiber[J]. Journal of AOAC International,1993,77 (3):703-709.
[6]艾晓杰,韩正康. 大麦和米糠中抗营养因子对家禽食糜性状的影响[J]. 饲料工业,2003,11:55-57.
[7]Brinch-Pedersen H,Srensen L D,Holm P B. Engineering crop plants:getting a handle on phosphate[J]. Trends in Plant Science,2002,7(3):118-125.
[8]ODell B L,de Boland A R,Koirtyohann S R. Distribution of phytate and nutritionally important elements among the morphological components of cereal grains[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,1972,20(3):718-723.
[9]Juliano B O. The rice caryopsis and its composition[M]//Houston D F. Rice Chemistry and Technology.Eagan,MN,USA:American Association of Cereal Chemists,1972:16-17.
[10]Arnone A,Perutz M. Structure of inositol hexaphosphate-human deoxyhaemoglobin complex[J]. Nature,1974,249:34-36.
[11]Reddy N,Salunkhe D. Interactions between phytate,protein,and minerals in whey fractions of black gram[J]. Journal of Food Science,1981,46(2):564-567.
[12]Selle P H,Cowieson A J,Cowieson N P,et al. Protein-phytate interactions in pig and poultry nutrition:a reappraisal[J]. Nutrition Research Reviews,2012,25(1):1-17.
[13]Zi P M,Kim I D,Shin D H,et al. Consecutive treatment with phytase and arazyme influence protein hydrolysis of soybean meal[J]. African Journal of Biotechnology,2013,10(40):7868-7873.
[14]Kong C,Adeola O. Protein utilization and amino acid digestibility of canola meal in response to phytase in broiler chickens[J]. Poultry Science,2011,90(7):1508-1515.
[15]Zeng Z,Piao X,Wang D,et al. Effect of microbial phytase on performance,nutrient absorption and excretion in weaned pigs and apparent ileal nutrient digestibility in growing pigs[J]. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci,2011,24(8):1164-1172.
[16]Haraldsson A K,Rimsten L,Alminger M,et al. Digestion of barley malt porridges in a gastrointestinal model:Iron dialysability,iron uptake by Caco-2 cells and degradation of β-glucan[J]. Journal of Cereal Science,2005,42(2):243-254.
[17]Madrid J,Martínez S,López C,et al. Effect of phytase on nutrient digestibility,mineral utilization and performance in growing pigs[J]. Livestock Science,2013,154(1):144-151.
[18]Bikker P,Jongbloed A,Thissen J. Meta-analysis of effects of microbial phytase on digestibility and bioavailability of copper and zinc in growing pigs[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2012,90:134-136.
[19]Pushpanjali S K. In vitro availability of iron and zinc from some Indian vegetarian diets:correlations with dietary fibre and phytate[J]. Food Chemistry,1996,56(2):111-114.
[20]Wang Y,Cheng Y,Ou K,et al. In vitro solubility of calcium,iron,and zinc in rice bran treated with phytase,cellulase,and protease[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,2008,56(24):11868-11874.
[21]张亚伟. 四种纤维原料的细胞壁组分在猪消化道各段变化规律及其相关性研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2014:50-51.

相似文献/References:

[1]张亚伟,王喜之,刘强,等.5种纤维原料的非淀粉多糖及矿物质在成年公鸡消化道各区段的消化规律[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(05):168.
 Zhang Yawei,et al.Digestive regularity of non starch polysaccharides and mineral of five kinds of fiber ingredients in different tract sites of adult cockerel[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(05):168.
[2]蔡观容,董臣飞,田吉鹏,等.混合青贮对西兰花尾菜青贮发酵品质的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(22):190.
 Cai Guanrong,et al.Influence of mixed silage on fermentation quality of broccoli tail vegetables[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2020,48(05):190.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2015-01-19
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(编号:31172237)。
作者简介:陈练(1989—),男,四川宜宾人,硕士研究生,主要从事饲料资源开发与利用研究。E-mail:2012105049@njau.edu.cn。
通信作者:刘强,博士,副教授,主要从事饲料资源开发与利用研究。E-mail:Liuayang@njau.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-05-25