|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李艳,段罗顺,马庆州,等.葡萄砧木SO4对淹水的生理生化特异响应[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(12):213-216.
 Li Yan,et al.Effects of waterlogging on physiological and biochemical characteristics of grape rootstock SO4[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2016,44(12):213-216.
点击复制

葡萄砧木SO4对淹水的生理生化特异响应(PDF)
分享到:

《江苏农业科学》[ISSN:1002-1302/CN:32-1214/S]

卷:
第44卷
期数:
2016年12期
页码:
213-216
栏目:
园艺与林学
出版日期:
2016-12-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of waterlogging on physiological and biochemical characteristics of grape rootstock SO4
作者:
李艳12段罗顺1马庆州1付艳东2翟衡2
1.郑州市农林科学研究所果树研究室,河南郑州 450005; 2.山东农业大学园艺科学与工程学院,山东泰安 271018
Author(s):
Li Yanet al
关键词:
葡萄砧木SO4淹水胁迫生理响应根系叶片
Keywords:
-
分类号:
S663.101
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
采用盆栽淹水法,测定淹水对1年生SO4叶片水势及根系生理指标的影响。结果表明,淹水3 d时,SO4叶片的水势显著低于对照,3 d后有明显恢复,随后持续降低;随淹水胁迫时间的延长,SO4根系丙酮酸脱羧酶(PDC)、乙醇脱氢酶(ADH)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)活性均呈先升后降的变化趋势,并均在胁迫6 d时达到最高值,根系呼吸强度、可溶性蛋白含量逐渐降低,超氧阴离子(O-2[KG-*2]· )产生速率持续上升;SO4植株K、Ca、Mg元素的含量有所降低,Fe、Zn、Cu元素的含量相对升高。
Abstract:
-

参考文献/References:

[1]Scandalios J G. Oxygen stress and superoxide dismutases[J]. Plant Physiology,1993,101(1):7-12.
[2]Crawford R M,Braendle R. Oxygen deprivation stress in a changing environment[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany,1996,47(2):145-159.
[3]李艳,付艳东,马艳春,等. 淹水对不同葡萄砧木生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2013,46(5):995-1004.
[4]毛志泉,王丽琴,沈向,等. 有机物料对平邑甜茶实生苗根系呼吸强度的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2004,10(2):171-175.
[5]王爱国,罗广华,邵从本,等. 大豆下胚轴线粒体产生超氧物自由基的效率[J]. 植物生理学报,1986,12(2):148-153.
[6]赵世杰,史国安,董新纯. 植物生理实验学指导[M]. 北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2002:134-135.
[7]Mustroph A,Albrecht G. Tolerance of crop plants to oxygen deficiency stress:fermentative activity and photosynthetic capacity of entire seedlings under hypoxia and anoxia[J]. Physiologia Plantarum,2003,117(4):508-520.
[8]Waters I,Morrell S,Greenway H,et al. Effects of anoxia on wheat seedlings Ⅱ.Influence of O2 supply prior to anoxia on tolerance to anoxia,alcoholic fermentation,and sugar levels[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany,1991,42(11):1437-1447.
[9]鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2000:270-280.
[10]Sachs M M,Subbaiah C C,Saab I N. Anaerobic gene expression and flooding tolerance in maize[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany,1996,47(1):1-15.
[11]Katoh H,Guo S R,Nada K,et al. Differences between tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)and cucumber(Cucumis sativus L.)in ethanol,lactate and malate metabolisms and cell sap pH of roots under hypoxia[J]. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science,1999,68(1):152-159.
[12]Germain V,Raymond P,Ricard B. Differential expression of two tomato lactate dehydrogenase genes in response to oxygen deficit[J]. Plant Molecular Biology,1997,35(6):711-721.
[13]Dennis E S,Dolferus R,Ellis M,et al. Molecular strategies for improving waterlogging tolerance in plants[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany,2000,51(342):89-97.
[14]刘周斌,杨博智,欧立军,等. 不同时期外施Ca1,2,32+缓解辣椒淹水胁迫伤害的研究[J]. 园艺学报,2015,42(8):1487-1494.
[15]齐琳,马娜,吴雯雯,等. 无花果品种幼苗淹水胁迫的生理响应与耐涝性评估[J]. 园艺学报,2015,42(7):1273-1284.
[16]Vartapetian B B,Jackson M B. Plant adaptations to anaerobic stress[J]. Annals of Botany,1997,79(1):3-20.
[17]常学秀,段昌群,王焕校. 根分泌作用与植物对金属毒害的抗性[J]. 应用生态学报,2000,11(2):315-320.
[18]Huang B R,Johnson J W,Nesmith D S,et al. Nutrient accumulation and distribution of wheat genotypes in response to waterlogging and nutrient supply[J]. Plant and Soil,1995,173(1):47-54.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2015-10-12
基金项目:国家葡萄产业技术体系建设项目(编号:CRAS-30-zp);长江学者和创新团队发展计划(编号:IRT1155)。
作者简介:李艳(1987—),女,河南新乡人,硕士,从事葡萄栽培生理研究。E-mail:liyan.0109@163.com。
通信作者:翟衡,研究员,从事葡萄栽培生理研究。Tel:(0538)8241335;E-mail:hengz@sdau.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-12-25