|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈崎,姜晓红,谭瑶,等.蓟马取食诱导的苜蓿代谢物变化[J].江苏农业科学,2023,51(3):126-132.
 Chen Qi,et al.Changes of alfalfa metabolites induced by feeding of thrips[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2023,51(3):126-132.
点击复制

蓟马取食诱导的苜蓿代谢物变化(PDF)
分享到:

《江苏农业科学》[ISSN:1002-1302/CN:32-1214/S]

卷:
第51卷
期数:
2023年第3期
页码:
126-132
栏目:
植物保护
出版日期:
2023-02-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Changes of alfalfa metabolites induced by feeding of thrips
作者:
陈崎1 姜晓红1 谭瑶2 爽爽1 刘慧杰1 代蕊1 特木尔布和1 张志强1
1.内蒙古农业大学草原与资源环境学院,内蒙古呼和浩特 010010; 2.内蒙古农业大学草原昆虫研究中心,内蒙古呼和浩特 010020
Author(s):
Chen Qiet al
关键词:
苜蓿蓟马代谢物诱导防御
Keywords:
-
分类号:
S433.89
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
蓟马是紫花苜蓿的主要害虫之一,严重影响苜蓿的产量和品质,进而影响苜蓿产业的健康发展。以草原2号(Medicago varia Martin. Caoyuan No.2)感蓟马品种、草原4号(Medicago sativa L. Caoyuan No.4)抗蓟马品种为材料,分别进行牛角花齿蓟马(Odontothrips loti)接虫和不接虫处理,利用广泛靶向代谢组学技术,分析蓟马取食诱导的苜蓿代谢物变化,从代谢水平探究蓟马取食引起的苜蓿诱导性防御机制。结果表明,蓟马取食会诱导苜蓿初生代谢物和次生代谢物发生变化。感蓟马品种草原2号苜蓿在蓟马取食前后的差异代谢物为178个(S-CK vs S-T),而抗蓟马品种草原4号苜蓿在蓟马取食前后的差异代谢物为116个(R-CK vs R-T),有60个差异代谢物在2个品种中都受到蓟马取食影响。在共同诱导的代谢物中,主要包括31个黄酮类化合物、7个有机酸及衍生物、7苯丙素和5个氨基酸及衍生物等12大类。蓟马取食诱导的代谢物变化主要集中在黄酮类化合物,包括麦黄酮、木樨草素、白杨素、芹菜苷等,说明黄酮类化合物在苜蓿诱导性防御中可能具有重要的作用,可为进一步开展苜蓿抗蓟马诱导性防御提供参考。
Abstract:
-

参考文献/References:

[1] 张奔,周敏强,王娟,等. 我国苜蓿害虫种类及研究现状[J]. 草业科学,2016,33(4):785-812.
[2]Cao Y,Zhi J R,Zhang R Z,et al. Different population performances of Frankliniella occidentalis and Thrips hawaiiensis on flowers of two horticultural plants[J]. Journal of Pest Science,2018,91(1):79-91.
[3]Steenbergen M,Abd-el-Haliem A,Bleeker P,et al. Thrips advisor:exploiting Thrips-induced defences to combat pests on crops[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany,2018,69(8):1837-1848.
[4]吴永敷,赵秀华,特木尔布和. 蓟马是我国苜蓿生产的主要害虫[J]. 中国草地,1990,12(3):65-66,64.
[5]杨青川. 苜蓿生产与管理指南[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,2003.
[6]War A R,Paulraj M G,Ahmad T,et al. Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores[J]. Plant Signaling & Behavior,2012,7(10):1306-1320.
[7]俞振明,李家玉,林志华,等. 植物抗性诱导防御病虫草害的研究进展[J]. 农业科学研究,2013,34(2):69-76.
[8]Züst T,Agrawal A A. Trade-offs between plant growth and defense against insect herbivory:an emerging mechanistic synthesis[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology,2017,68:513-534.
[9]Sharma H C. Biotechnological approaches for pest management and ecological sustainability[M]. Boca Raton,FL:CRC Press,2009
[10] Aljbory Z,Chen M S. Indirect plant defense against insect herbivores:a review[J]. Insect Science,2018,25(1):2-23.
[11]王小珊. 牛角花齿蓟马(Odontothrips loti)为害对苜蓿叶片次生代谢物质含量的影响[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2014.
[12]Tu X B,Liu Z K,Zhang Z H. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of resistant and susceptible alfalfa cultivars (Medicago sativa L.) after thrips infestation[J]. BMC Genomics,2018,19(1):116.
[13]Mouden S,Leiss K A. Host plant resistance to thrips (Thysanoptera:Thripidae)-current state of art and future research avenues[J]. Current Opinion in Insect Science,2021,45:28-34.
[14]Liu Y Q,Li J,Ban L P. Morphology and distribution of antennal sensilla in three species of Thripidae (Thysanoptera) infesting alfalfa Medicago sativa[J]. Insects,2021,12(1):81.
[15]萨如拉,张志强,伟勒斯,等. 两个苜蓿品种营养器官解剖结构特征比较[J]. 西北植物学报,2020,40(11):1881-1887.
[16]特木尔布和,肖燕子. 苜蓿新品种草原4号的选育[J]. 草业科学,2017,34(4):855-860.
[17]Wang J L,Zhang T,Shen X T,et al. Serum metabolomics for early diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by UHPLC-QTOF/MS[J]. Metabolomics,2016,12(7):116.
[18]Slade W O,Werth E G,McConnell E W,et al. Quantifying reversible oxidation of protein thiols in photosynthetic organisms[J]. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry,2015,26(4):631-640.
[19]陈海波. 杂交杨混交人工林的抗虫性及其机制研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院,2020.
[20]冉伟. 基于代谢组学的蚜虫为害降低茶树对茶尺蠖的抗性机制研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院,2018.
[21]Emani C. The biology of plant-insect interactions:a compendium for the plant biotechnologist[M]. Florida:CRC Press,2018
[22]Bertea C M,Casacci L P,Bonelli S,et al. Chemical,physiological and molecular responses of host plants to lepidopteran egg-laying[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2020,10:1768.
[23]董妍玲,潘学武. 植物次生代谢产物简介[J]. 生物学通报,2002,37(11):17-19.
[24]杨金睿,肖关丽. 植物抗虫生理研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报,2021,37(6):130-136.
[25]Fraenkel G S. The raison dtre of secondary plant substances;these odd chemicals arose as a means of protecting plants from insects and now guide insects to food[J]. Science,1959,129(3361):1466-1470.
[26]赵颖,黄凤宽,童晓立,等. 水稻品种中抗褐飞虱抗原次生物质的分析[J]. 应用生态学报,2004,15(11):2161-2164.
[27]Wu F,Shi S L,Li Y Z,et al. Physiological and biochemical response of different resistant alfalfa cultivars against thrips damage[J]. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants,2021,27(3):649-663.
[28]王柄权,程凌寒,方宇,等. 植物次生代谢物质对草地贪夜蛾解毒酶活性及相关基因表达的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2022,50(8):11-15.
[29]Burghardt F,Knüttel H,Becker M,et al. Flavonoid wing pigments increase attractiveness of female common blue (Polyommatus icarus) butterflies to mate-searching males[J]. Naturwissenschaften,2000,87(7):304-307.
[30]凌冰,董红霞,张茂新,等. 水稻麦黄酮对褐飞虱的抗性潜力[J]. 生态学报,2007,27(4):1300-1307.
[31]Harborne J B,Williams C A. Flavonoid patterns in leaves of the Gramineae[J]. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology,1976,4(4):267-280.
[32]Bouaziz M,Simmonds M S J,Grayer R J,et al. Flavonoids from Hyparrhenia hirta stapf (Poaceae) growing in Tunisia[J]. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology,2001,29(8):849-851.
[33]马康生,王静慧,解晓平,等. 棉蚜对新烟碱类杀虫剂的抗性现状及其治理策略[J]. 植物保护学报,2021,48(5):947-957.
[34]张文辉,刘光杰. 植物抗虫性次生物质的研究概况[J]. 植物学通报,2003,38(5):522-530.
[35]胡大星,李成,吴碧球,等. 褐飞虱为害对不同抗性水稻品种苗期根系几种营养物质和总酚含量的影响[J]. 环境昆虫学报,2021,43(2):413-419.
[36]李传明,何菁,顾爱祥,等. 烟粉虱取食对不同抗虫性辣椒品种营养物质和抗性物质的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2017,25(10):1456-1462.
[37]闫慧芳,毛培胜,夏方山. 植物抗氧化剂谷胱甘肽研究进展[J]. 草地学报,2013,21(3):428-434.

相似文献/References:

[1]吉沐祥,吴祥,肖婷,等.多杀霉素与苦参碱复配对草莓蓟马的毒力测定与田间防效[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(07):101.
 Ji Muxiang,et al.Toxicity test and field control effect of spinosad mixed with matrine on Frankliniella intonsa (Trybom)[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2013,41(3):101.
[2]田福平,路远,张小甫,等.苜蓿新品种(系)的抗旱性综合评价[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(01):160.
 Tian Fuping,et al.Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of new alfalfa varieties[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(3):160.
[3]庞建光,姬红萍,武龙.桑园套种大豆和苜蓿对杂草群落及其生物多样性的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(04):187.
 Pang Jianguang,et al.Effects of interplanting soybean and alfalfa on weeds community and its biodiversity in mulberry garden[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2016,44(3):187.
[4]李波,陈雪梅,李铁缘,等.2种不同抗旱性冰草叶片解剖结构的比较[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(09):247.
 Li Bo,et al.Comparison of leaf anatomical structure of two Agropyron sp. with different drought resistance[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2015,43(3):247.
[5]李波,陈雪梅,于海龙,等.混合盐碱胁迫对苜蓿种子萌发特性的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(08):221.
 Li Bo,et al.Effect of mixed salt and alkali stress on seed germination of alfalfa[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2015,43(3):221.
[6]王健胜,王 婕,梁亚红,等.不同苜蓿品种农艺性状的分析与评价[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(07):241.
 Wang Jiansheng,et al.Analysis and evaluation of agronomical traits of different alfalfa varieties[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2015,43(3):241.
[7]王健胜,侯桂玲,佟伟霜,等.不同苜蓿品种种子的发芽特性[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(06):158.
 Wang Jiansheng,et al.Seed germination characteristics of different alfalfa varieties[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(3):158.
[8]李红,李波,陈雪梅,等.苜蓿愈伤组织细胞学观察及芽分化的研究[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(06):49.
 Li Hong,et al.Study on cytological observation of Medicago sativa callus and its bud redifferentiation[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2015,43(3):49.
[9]肖婷,狄华涛,杨敬辉,等.江苏省句容市草莓大棚冬前小型昆虫发生规律[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(05):129.
 Xiao Ting,et al.Investigation report of small insects in strawberry greenhouses before winter in Jurong,Jiangsu Province[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2015,43(3):129.
[10]陈应武,夏彦飞.黄土高原草田轮作对土壤动物群落结构和多样性的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(12):353.
 Chen Yingwu,et al.Effects of Loess Plateau grassland crop rotation on community structure and diversity of soil animals[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(3):353.
[11]马建华,陈华,王颖,等.宁夏地区苜蓿蓟马的种类调查及鉴定方法[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(24):88.
 Ma Jianhua,et al.Species investigation and identification methods of Frankliniella occidentalis in Ningxia area[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2017,45(3):88.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-04-28
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(编号:32160333、32060388);内蒙古自然科学基金(编号:NJZY20043)。
作者简介:陈崎(1999—),女,内蒙古乌拉特前旗人,硕士研究生,主要从事草学方面的研究。E-mail:ndcq@emails.imau.edu.cn。
通信作者:张志强,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事牧草种质资源与品种选育研究。E-mail:zhangzq1989@imau.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-02-05