|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]肖丹,张苏江,王明,等.不同甜高粱品种与玉米主要农艺性状比较[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(05):79-83.
 Xiao Dan,et al.Comparison of major agronomic characteristics of different varieties of sweet sorghum and maize[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2017,45(05):79-83.
点击复制

不同甜高粱品种与玉米主要农艺性状比较(PDF)
分享到:

《江苏农业科学》[ISSN:1002-1302/CN:32-1214/S]

卷:
第45卷
期数:
2017年05期
页码:
79-83
栏目:
遗传育种与耕作栽培
出版日期:
2017-03-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of major agronomic characteristics of different varieties of sweet sorghum and maize
作者:
肖丹张苏江王明周斐然
塔里木大学动物科学学院/塔里木畜牧科技兵团重点实验室,新疆阿拉尔 843300
Author(s):
Xiao Danet al
关键词:
甜高粱农艺性状含糖锤度生物产量
Keywords:
-
分类号:
S513.04;S514.04
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为筛选适合南疆地区气候地理环境栽培的甜高粱品种,以玉米为对照,对各参试品种的主要农艺性状进行分析比较。结果显示,(1)甜高粱中的雷伊、绿能2号、甜饲1号均属于中熟品种,大力王、海牛属于极晚熟品种。新饲玉11号比雷伊等中熟品种早24~26 d到达腊熟期。(2)大力王的株高、茎粗均最大;各供试品种的茎粗从大到小排序为大力王>雷伊>新饲玉11号>海牛>甜饲1号>绿能2号。(3)各品种的锤度随节数自基部向上呈现不同的变化趋势,绿能2号的含糖锤度最高,为22.40%;新饲玉11号的含糖锤度最低,为10.99%。(4)新饲玉11号与大力王、海牛之间的叶宽、叶长等农艺性状差异性显著。(5)大力王和海牛的产量分别为146 823.40、121 895.45 kg/hm2,绿能2号的产量最低,为48 570.99 kg/hm2,大力王、海牛与其他品种的单株鲜质量、单株叶质量、单株茎质量差异极显著。可见,与玉米比较,大力王、海牛、雷伊以及绿能2号甜高粱品种的适应性较好,主要农艺性状表现良好,可作为南疆地区饲料作物栽培的高粱品种。
Abstract:
-

参考文献/References:

[1]肖丹,张苏江,陈立强,等. 甜高粱饲料在南疆粗饲料资源开发中的前景分析[J]. 草食家畜,2014(6):22-27.
[2]Türe S,Uzun D,Türe I E. The potential use of sweet sorghum as a non-polluting source of energy[J]. Energy,1997,22(1):17-19.
[3]Corredor D Y,Salazar J M,Hohn K L,et al. Evaluation and characterization of forage sorghum as feedstock for fermentable sugar production[J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology,2009,158(1):164-179.
[4]Wu X,Staggenborg S,Propheter J L,et al. Features of sweet sorghum juice and their performance in ethanol fermentation[J]. Industrial Crops and Products,2010,31(1):164-170.
[5]Yu J L,Zhang X,Tan T W. Ethanol production by solid state fermentation of sweet sorghum using thermotolerant yeast strain[J]. Fuel Processing Technology,2008,89(11):1056-1059.
[6]Rooney W L,Blumenthal J,Bean B,et al. Designing sorghum as a dedicated bioenergy feedstock[J]. Biofuels,Bioproducts and Biorefining,2007,1(2):147-157.
[7]Kurle J E,Sheaffer C C,Crookston R K,et al. Popcorn,sweet corn,and sorghum as alternative silage crops[J]. Journal of Production Agriculture,1991,4(3):432-436.
[8]Ritter K B,Jordan D R,Chapman S C,et al. Identification of QTL for sugar-related traits in a sweet×grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) recombinant inbred population[J]. Molecular Breeding,2008,22(3):367-384.
[9]新疆维吾尔自治区统计局. 新疆统计年年鉴[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社,2001.
[10]Zhang W T,Wu H Q,Gu H B,et al. Variability of soil salinity at multiple spatio-temporal scales and the related driving factors in the oasis areas of Xinjiang,China[J]. Pedosphere,2014,24(6):753-762.
[11]Zhang S J,Chaudhry A S,Osman A,et al. Associative effects of ensiling mixtures of sweet sorghum and alfalfa on nutritive value,fermentation and methane characteristics[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2015,206:29-38.
[12]Zhang S J,Chaudhry A S,Ramdani D,et al. Chemical composition and in vitro fermentation characteristics of high sugar forage sorghum as an alternative to forage maize for silage making in Tarim Basin,China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2016,15(1):175-182.
[13]曹文伯. 我国甜高粱种质资源鉴定及利用概况[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2001,2(1):58-62.
[14]艾买尔江·吾斯曼,吐热衣夏木·依米提,张苏江. 不同基因型甜高粱品种干物质积累规律研究[J]. 塔里木大学学报,2013,25(1):39-41.
[15]冯国郡,叶凯,涂振东. 时空变化对甜高粱农艺性状的影响及分析[J]. 新疆农业科学,2010,47(2):285-290.
[16]王兆木,涂振东,贾东海. 新疆甜高粱开发利用研究[J]. 新疆农业科学,2007,44(1):50-54.
[17]冯国郡,叶凯,涂振东,等. 甜高粱主要农艺性状相关性和主成分分析[J]. 新疆农业科学,2010,47(8):1552-1556.
[18]艾买尔江·吾斯曼,吐热依夏木·依米体,吴全忠. 甜高粱在新疆生态条件下的适应性研究[J]. 新疆农垦科技,2011,34(1):16-18.
[19]张苏江,艾买尔江·吾斯曼,薛兴中,等. 南疆玉米和不同糖分甜高粱的青贮品质分析[J]. 草业学报,2014,23(3):232-240.
[20]卢庆善. 甜高粱[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社,2008:83-102.
[21]赵香娜,李桂英,刘洋,等. 国内外甜高粱种质资源主要性状遗传多样性及相关性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2008,9(3):302-307.
[22]孙宏,曹文伯,谢奎龙. 甜高粱杂交组合主要性状(海南·北京)两地表现的比较——加快育种速度的探讨[J]. 中国种业,2007(1):38-39.
[23]赵立欣,张艳丽,沈丰菊. 能源作物甜高粱及其可供应性研究[J]. 可再生能源,2005(4):37-40.
[24]叶凯,冯国郡,涂振东,等. 新疆能源作物甜高粱茎节锤度与茎秆平均锤度的关系研究[J]. 新疆农业科学,2008,45(6):1035-1041.
[25]石龙阁. 我国甜高梁产业发展前景分析[J]. 杂粮作物,2007,27(3):242-243.
[26]石永顺,王艳秋,王立新,等. 加快甜高粱科研和生产开发[J]. 辽宁农业科学,2004(3):30-31.
[27]康志河,杨国红,杨晓平,等. 发展甜高粱生产开创能源农业新时代[J]. 中国农学通报,2005,21(1):340-341.
[28]Tefera T,Tana T. Agronomic performance of sorghum and groundnut cultivars in sole and intercrop cultivation under semiarid conditions[J]. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science,2002,188(3):212-218.
[29]高明超,王鹏文. 甜高粱主要农艺性状遗传参数估计[J]. 安徽农学通报,2007,13(5):114.
[30]闫锋. 甜高粱主要农艺性状遗传参数分析[J]. 中国糖料,2010(1):24-26.

相似文献/References:

[1]黄忠阳,陈舜权,胡俏强,等.种植密度对超甜玉米晶甜18主要农艺性状及产量的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(12):106.
 Huang Zhongyang,et al.Effects of different planting densities on yield and main agronomic characteristics of super sweet corn cultivar “Jingtian 18”[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(05):106.
[2]邱雪柏,陈伟,陈懿,等.不同移栽方式对烤烟生长发育及产值的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(11):136.
 Qiu Xuebai,et al().Effects of different transplanting ways on growth and output value of flue-cured tobacco[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(05):136.
[3]杨梅,李洋,陈丽君,等.密度和磷肥对豌豆农艺性状和产量的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(06):83.
 Yang Mei,et al.Effects of density and phosphatic fertilizer on agronomic traits and yield of pea[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2013,41(05):83.
[4]王宗标,王幸,徐泽俊,等.植物保健剂对大豆产量及农艺性状的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(06):85.
 Wang Zongbiao,et al.Effects of plant health care agent on yield and agronomic traits of soybean[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2013,41(05):85.
[5]王倩,刘卫东,朱士农,等.茄子营养品质与主要农艺性状的灰色关联分析[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(12):184.
 Wang Qian,et al.Grey relational grade analysis between quality and main agronomic traits of eggplant[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2015,43(05):184.
[6]陈彩锦,穆兰海,母养秀,等.播期对荞麦农艺性状和产量的影响及其相互关系[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(12):127.
 Chen Caijin,et al.Effects of sowing dates on agronomic traits and yield of buckwheat and analysis of their relationship[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2015,43(05):127.
[7]滕志英,周凤明,张安存,等.不同种植方式对粳稻华粳5号农艺、经济性状及经济效益的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(12):86.
 Teng Zhiying,et al.Effects of different planting patterns on agronomic traits,economic characters and economic benefits of japonica rice “Huajing No.5”[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2015,43(05):86.
[8]张飞,邹剑秋,王艳秋,等.能源作物A1、A3型细胞质甜高粱光合生产及物质分配特性比较[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(08):101.
 Zhang Fei,et al.Comparison of photosynthesis and material distribution characteristics between A1-type and A3-type cytoplasmic sweet sorghum[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2013,41(05):101.
[9]新楠,罗峰,李贺,等.播期对天津地区甜高粱主要性状的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(08):90.
 Xin Nan,et al.Effect of sowing date on main characters of sweet sorghum in Tianjin area[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(05):90.
[10]王琨,崔志钢,顾昌华,等.同名小麦地方品种形态农艺性状遗传多样性分析[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(08):77.
 Wang Kun,et al.Genetic diversity analysis of morphological and agronomic traits of wheat landraces with the same name[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(05):77.
[11]高进,蔡立旺,王永慧,等.甜高粱新品种(系)综合评价与聚类分析[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(20):93.
 Gao Jin,et al.Synthetic evaluation and cluster analysis of new sweet sorghum cultivars(lines)[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2017,45(05):93.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-01-18
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(编号:31160472、31260565);塔里木大学博士基金(编号:TDZKBS201102)。
作者简介:肖丹(1991—),女,四川南充人,硕士研究生,从事饲料资源开发利用研究。E-mail:519810578@qq.com。
通信作者:张苏江,博士,教授,主要从事动物营养与饲料专业的教学与研究工作。E-mail:zsjdky@126.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-03-05