|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]刘旭,迟春明.盐碱土饱和浸提液2种制备方法比较[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(03):298-299.
　Liu Xu,et al.Comparison of two kinds of preparation methods of saline alkali soil saturated leaching solution[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2015,43(03):298-299.
点击复制

盐碱土饱和浸提液2种制备方法比较(PDF)
分享到：

《江苏农业科学》[ISSN:1002-1302/CN:32-1214/S]

卷:
第43卷
期数:
2015年03期
页码:
298-299
栏目:
资源与环境
出版日期:
2015-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of two kinds of preparation methods of saline alkali soil saturated leaching solution
作者:
刘旭;  迟春明
塔里木大学植物科学学院，新疆阿拉尔 843300
Author(s):
Liu Xu; et al
关键词:
盐碱土; 饱和浸提液; 浸润法; 电导率; USSL法
Keywords:
-
分类号:
S156.4；S151.9
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
分别采用美国盐土实验室推荐的USSL方法、浸润法制备土壤饱和泥浆，抽滤得到盐碱土饱和浸提液，测定电导率。结果表明：供试30份土样，2种方法获得的饱和泥浆土壤饱和含水量之间差异不显著；美国盐土实验室方法制备土壤饱和浸提液电导率变化范围为0.75~31.34 dS/m，浸润法制备的土壤饱和浸提液电导率变化范围为0.75~36.90 dS/m，2种方法制备的土壤饱和浸提液电导率测定值间不存在显著差异。
Abstract:
-

参考文献/References:

［1］USDA. Diagnoses and improvement of saline and alkali soils［M］. Riverside：United Sates Salinity Laboratory，1954：83-90.
［2］Ayers R S，Westcot D W. Water quality for agriculture［M］. Rome：FAO，1985：14-42.
［3］Rhoades J D， Chanduvi F ，Lesch S.Soil salinity assessment：methods and interpretation of electrical conductivity measurements［M］. Rome：FAO，1991：5-14.
［4］Qadir M，Schubert S. Degradation processes and nutrient constraints in sodic soils［J］. Land Degradation & Development，2002，13：275-294.
［5］Rhoades J D. Electrical conductivity methods for measuring and mapping soil salinity［J］. Advances in Agronomy，1993，49：201-251.

相似文献/References:

[1]王静,孙兆军,毕江涛.燃煤脱硫废弃物对盐碱地林草生长发育及土壤性质的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(04):339.
[2]王桂君,许振文,田晓露,等.生物炭对盐碱化土壤理化性质及小麦幼苗生长的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(12):390.
　Wang Guijun,et al.Effects of biochar on physiochemical properties of soil and growth of wheat seedlings in saline-alkali soil[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2013,41(03):390.
[3]徐鹏程,冷翔鹏,刘更森,等.盐碱土改良利用研究进展[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(05):293.
　Xu Pengcheng,et al.Research progress of improvement and utilization of saline-alkali soil[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(03):293.
[4]李学平,刘 萍,李甲亮,等.盐碱化草坪土壤耐盐解磷真菌的筛选及解磷能力研究[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(07):367.
　Li Xueping,et al.Study on screening and phosphate-solubilizing ability of phosphate-solubilizing fungus with salt tolerance in saline alkali turf soil[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2015,43(03):367.
[5]刘旭,迟春明.南疆盐渍土饱和浸提液与土水比1 ∶5浸提液电导率换算关系[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(01):289.
　Liu Xu,et al.Relationships of electrical conductivity between 1 ∶5 soil/water extracts and saturation paste extracts of salt-affected soils in southern Xinjiang[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2015,43(03):289.
[6]官利兰,陈锐浩,程凤娴,等.不同灌水量对2种盐碱土的洗盐效果比较[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(07):492.
　Guan Lilan,et al.Comparative study on salt leaching effects of different water amount at two kinds of saline soil[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2016,44(03):492.
[7]宋秀丽.不同改良方法对重度盐碱化草甸土壤化学性质的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(09):498.
　Song Xiuli.Effect of different modified methods on chemical properties of soil in severe saline alkaline meadow[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2016,44(03):498.
[8]夏婷,杨建国,魏玉清,等.旱作条件下盐分冲洗试验对盐碱土的改良洗盐效果[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(08):235.
　Xia Ting,et al.Effect of salt washing on saline-alkali soil under dry cultivation[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2017,45(03):235.
[9]夏婷,杨建国,魏玉清.旱作盐碱农田洗盐措施效果评价[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(09):228.
　Xia Ting,et al.Effect evaluation of salt-washing measures in dryland saline-alkali farmland[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2017,45(03):228.
[10]张志晓,王燕,江文,等.不同砧木绿宝苹果幼树对盐碱土的适应性[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(23):153.
　Zhang Zhixiao,et al.Adaptability of “Bramley” young apple trees with different rootstocks to saline-alkali soil[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2017,45(03):153.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2014-04-26
基金项目：国家自然科学基金(编号：41161037)。
作者简介：刘旭(1982—)，女，硕士，讲师，主要研究方向为园林植物与盐渍土环境。E-mail：jane4531171@126.com 。
通信作者：迟春明，博士，副教授，主要从事盐渍土研究。E-mail：chichunming@126.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-03-25