|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]郭柯凡,王丰,娄文月,等.有机种植对滨海稻田氨挥发特征及水稻产量的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2023,51(10):243-249.
 Guo Kefan,et al.Impacts of organic cultivation on ammonia volatilization and rice yield in coastal paddy field[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2023,51(10):243-249.
点击复制

有机种植对滨海稻田氨挥发特征及水稻产量的影响(PDF)
分享到:

《江苏农业科学》[ISSN:1002-1302/CN:32-1214/S]

卷:
第51卷
期数:
2023年第10期
页码:
243-249
栏目:
资源与环境
出版日期:
2023-05-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Impacts of organic cultivation on ammonia volatilization and rice yield in coastal paddy field
作者:
郭柯凡12王丰3娄文月3朱元宏4沙之敏3曹林奎3蒋敏12
1.江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室/江苏省作物栽培生理重点实验室/扬州大学农学院,江苏扬州 225009;2.江苏省粮食作物现代产业技术协同创新中心/扬州大学,江苏扬州 225009;3.上海交通大学农业与生物学院,上海 200240; 4.上海青浦现代农业园区发展有限公司,上海 201717
Author(s):
Guo Kefanet al
关键词:
水稻滨海盐土有机种植氨挥发产量
Keywords:
-
分类号:
S181;S511.06
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了探讨有机种植对滨海稻田氨挥发损失及水稻产量的影响,设置不施肥对照(CK)、常规种植(CT)、有机种植(CO)3个处理,采用密闭室间歇抽气法,开展有机种植方式下滨海稻田氨挥发特征的研究。结果表明,有机种植的滨海稻田氨挥发总量为34.72 kg/hm2,较常规种植显著降低55.94%(P<0.05)。田面水NH+4-N浓度与稻田氨挥发通量呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),有机种植可有效降低田面水NH+4-N浓度,从而直接减少了氨挥发的产生。有机种植的水稻产量下降4.33%,但与常规种植相比,未达显著水平。因此,有机种植在保持水稻基本稳产的情况下,有效降低了滨海稻田由于氨挥发造成的氮素损失。
Abstract:
-

参考文献/References:

[1]杨劲松. 中国盐渍土研究的发展历程与展望[J]. 土壤学报,2008,45(5):837-845.
[2]丁海荣,洪立洲,杨智青,等. 盐碱地及其生物措施改良研究现状[J]. 现代农业科技,2010(6):299-300,308.
[3]苑佰飞,马玉涛,包岩,等. 水稻种植对吉林省西部苏打盐碱土改良培肥效果[J]. 水土保持学报,2019,33(3):320-326.
[4]傅庆林,朱芸,郭彬,等. 稻麦轮作对滨海盐土土壤肥力的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学,2022,63(6):1135-1138.
[5]严凯,蒋玉兰,唐纪元,等. 盐碱地条件下施氮量和栽插密度对水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2018(2):67-74.
[6]Ti C P,Xia L L,Chang S X,et al. Potential for mitigating global agricultural ammonia emission:a meta-analysis[J]. Environmental Pollution,2019,245:141-148.
[7]Yao Y L,Zhang M,Tian Y H,et al. Urea deep placement for minimizing NH3 loss in an intensive rice cropping system[J]. Field Crops Research,2018,218:254-266.
[8]Abdo A I,Shi D P,Li J,et al. Ammonia emission from staple crops in China as response to mitigation strategies and agronomic conditions:Meta-analytic study[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,279:123835.
[9]Sun H F,Zhou S,Zhang J N,et al. Effects of controlled-release fertilizer on rice grain yield,nitrogen use efficiency,and greenhouse gas emissions in a paddy field with straw incorporation[J]. Field Crops Research,2020,253:107814.
[10]Huang X,Song Y,Li M M,et al. A high-resolution ammonia emission inventory in China[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles,2012,26(1):GB1030.
[11]Tian X F,Li C L,Zhang M,et al. Controlled release urea improved crop yields and mitigated nitrate leaching under cotton-garlic intercropping system in a 4-year field trial[J]. Soil and Tillage Research,2018,175:158-167.
[12]Pan B B,Lam S K,Mosier A,et al. Ammonia volatilization from synthetic fertilizers and its mitigation strategies:a global synthesis[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment,2016,232:283-289.
[13]Liu T Q,Huang J F,Chai K B,et al. Effects of N fertilizer sources and tillage practices on NH3 volatilization,grain yield,and N use efficiency of rice fields in central China[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2018,9:385.
[14]He T H,Liu D Y,Yuan J J,et al. A two years study on the combined effects of biochar and inhibitors on ammonia volatilization in an intensively managed rice field[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment,2018,264:44-53.
[15]李燕青,温延臣,林治安,等. 不同有机肥与化肥配施对作物产量及农田氮肥气态损失的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(11):1835-1846.
[16]李喜喜,杨娟,王昌全,等. 猪粪施用对成都平原稻季氨挥发特征的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2015,34(11):2236-2244.
[17]李菊梅,李冬初,徐明岗,等. 红壤双季稻田不同施肥下的氨挥发损失及其影响因素[J]. 生态环境,2008,17(4):1610-1613.
[18]Qi X L,Nie L X,Liu H Y,et al. Grain yield and apparent N recovery efficiency of dry direct-seeded rice under different N treatments aimed to reduce soil ammonia volatilization[J]. Field Crops Research,2012,134:138-143.
[19]肖其亮,朱坚,彭华,等. 稻田氨挥发损失及减排技术研究进展[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2021,40(1):16-25.
[20]武星魁,姜振萃,陆志新,等. 有机肥部分替代化肥氮对叶菜产量和环境效应的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文),2020,28(3):349-356.
[21]张怡彬,李俊改,王震,等. 有机替代下华北平原旱地农田氨挥发的年际减排特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2021,27(1):1-11.
[22]邢月,沙之敏,卑志钢,等. 不同施肥方式对稻田氨挥发特征的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2019,47(17):313-318.
[23]张奇,徐娅玲,姚莉,等. 有机无机肥配施对川中紫色土丘陵区稻田氨挥发的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报,2021,39(4):518-523,548.
[24]吴凡,张克强,谢坤,等. 洱海流域典型农区不同施肥处理下稻田氨挥发变化特征[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2019,38(8):1735-1742.
[25]杨国英,郭智,刘红江,等. 稻田氨挥发影响因素及其减排措施研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报,2020,29(9):1912-1919.
[26]Sun L Y,Wu Z,Ma Y C,et al. Ammonia volatilization and atmospheric N deposition following straw and urea application from a rice-wheat rotation in southeastern China[J]. Atmospheric Environment,2018,181:97-105.
[27]卢昕宇,陈丹艳,宁运旺,等. 水肥耦合对稻田氨挥发及水稻产量的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2022,38(5):1211-1219.
[28]邓美华,尹斌,张绍林,等. 不同施氮量和施氮方式对稻田氨挥发损失的影响[J]. 土壤,2006,38(3):263-269.
[29]刘小粉. 有机种植对土壤养分含量及物理特性的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报,2021,27(12):87-89.
[30]吴萍萍,刘金剑,杨秀霞,等. 不同施肥制度对红壤地区双季稻田氨挥发的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学,2009,23(1):85-93.
[31]Yang W L,Que H L,Wang S W,et al. High temporal resolution measurements of ammonia emissions following different nitrogen application rates from a rice field in the Taihu Lake Region of China[J]. Environmental Pollution,2020,257:113489.
[32]沈仕洲,万辰,马瑛骏,等. 水旱轮作条件下畜禽有机肥氮素矿化特征[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2021,40(11):2513-2520.
[33]Agehara S,Warncke D D.Soil moisture and temperature effects on nitrogen release from organic nitrogen sources[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,2005,69(6):1844-1855.
[34]韩晓日,郑国砥,刘晓燕,等. 有机肥与化肥配合施用土壤微生物量氮动态、来源和供氮特征[J]. 中国农业科学,2007,40(4):765-772.
[35]周博,高佳佳,周建斌. 不同种类有机肥碳、氮矿化特性研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2012,18(2):366-373.

相似文献/References:

[1]马旭俊,刘春娟,吕世博,等.绿色荧光蛋白基因在水稻遗传转化中的应用[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(04):35.
[2]李岳峰,居立海,张来运,等.水分胁迫下丛枝菌根对水稻/绿豆间作系统 作物生长和氮磷吸收的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(04):58.
[3]崔月峰,孙国才,王桂艳,等.不同施氮水平和前氮后移措施对水稻产量 及氮素利用率的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(04):66.
[4]张其蓉,宋发菊,田进山,等.长江中下游稻区水稻区域试验品种抗稻瘟病鉴定与评价[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(04):92.
[5]王麒,张小明,卞景阳,等.不同插秧密度对黑龙江省第二积温带水稻产量及产量构成的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(05):60.
 Wang Qi,et al.Effect of different transplanting density on yield and yield component of rice in second temperature zone of Heilongjiang Province[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2013,41(10):60.
[6]张国良,张森林,丁秀文,等.基质厚度和含水量对水稻育秧的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(05):62.
 Zhang Guoliang,et al.Effects of substrate thickness and water content on growth of rice seedlings[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2013,41(10):62.
[7]赵忠宝,朱清海.稻-蟹-鳅生态系统的能值分析[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(05):349.
 Zhao Zhongbao,et al.Emergy analysis of paddy-crab-loach ecosystem[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2013,41(10):349.
[8]杨红福,姚克兵,束兆林,等.甲氧基丙烯酸酯类杀菌剂对水稻恶苗病的田间药效[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(12):166.
 Yang Hongfu,et al.Field efficacy of strobilurin fungicides against rice bakanae disease[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(10):166.
[9]唐成,陈露,安敏敏,等.稻瘟病诱导水稻幼苗叶片氧化还原系统的特征谱变化[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(12):141.
 Tang Cheng,et al.Characteristic spectral changes of redox homeostasis system in rice seedling leaves induced by rice blast[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(10):141.
[10]万云龙.优质水稻—春甘蓝轮作高效栽培模式[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(12):90.
 Wan Yunlong.Efficient cultivation mode of high quality rice-spring cabbage rotation[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(10):90.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-12-14
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(编号:31801310);上海市水稻产业体系项目[编号:沪农科产字(2022)第3号];江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划(编号:KYCX21-3243);江苏省高等学校基础科学(自然科学)研究项目(编号:21KJA210001)。
作者简介:郭柯凡(1997—),男,江苏苏州人,硕士研究生,从事稻田生态系统氮素利用方面研究。E-mail:1030219980@qq.com。
通信作者:蒋敏,副研究员,主要从事农业生态学方面研究。E-mail:jiangmin@yzu.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-05-20