|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]郑亚妮,杨婧宇,李柔柔,等.番茄非生物胁迫响应基因研究现状[J].江苏农业科学,2025,53(4):1-7.
　Zheng Yani,et al.Research status of abiotic stress response genes in tomatoes[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2025,53(4):1-7.
点击复制

番茄非生物胁迫响应基因研究现状(PDF)
分享到：

《江苏农业科学》[ISSN:1002-1302/CN:32-1214/S]

卷:
第53卷
期数:
2025年第4期
页码:
1-7
栏目:
专论与综述
出版日期:
2025-02-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research status of abiotic stress response genes in tomatoes
作者:
郑亚妮1; 杨婧宇1; 李柔柔1; 常欢1; 王丽萍1; 2; 王星1; 2; 3
1.河北工程大学园艺系，河北邯郸 056038； 2.茄果类蔬菜种苗繁育河北省工程研究中心，河北邯郸 056038； 3.河北省邯郸市蔬菜改良与繁育技术创新中心，河北邯郸 056038
Author(s):
Zheng Yani; et al
关键词:
番茄; 非生物胁迫; 抗逆基因; 干旱胁迫; 低温胁迫; 盐胁迫
Keywords:
-
分类号:
S641.201
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
全球气候及环境的变化对经济作物的生产具有较大的影响，其中干旱、极端温度、盐渍化等非生物胁迫严重制约着经济作物的生产效益。番茄是世界性的经济作物，在全球的蔬菜作物栽培中具有着重要的地位。然而，种植过程中各种非生物胁迫严重阻碍了我国番茄产业的发展。前人的研究表明，提高番茄自身的抗逆能力以及培育优良抗逆性新品种是抵御非生物胁迫最有效的手段之一，而优质抗逆种质的利用是抗逆育种的必要前提。因此，深入挖掘番茄抗逆基因及其逆境响应机制已经成为当前科研人员研究的热点问题。随着分子生物技术、高通量测序技术的飞速发展，越来越多的基因被证实参与了番茄对逆境的响应。但是，截至目前，抗逆基因的挖掘及机制的研究始终围绕某一逆境因子，缺乏系统性阐述。本文聚焦于番茄在干旱、高温、低温及盐胁迫等非生物逆境下的响应机制，通过综述现有的研究成果，系统梳理番茄在这些胁迫条件下的生理变化、基因表达调控及信号转导途径，旨在为未来的番茄抗逆育种研究提供科学参考。
Abstract:
-

参考文献/References:

［1］Mittler R. Abiotic stress，the field environment and stress combination［J］. Trends in Plant Science，2006，11(1)：15-19.
［2］张海鑫. 多毛番茄CDPK基因家族分析及胁迫响应分析［D］. 哈尔滨：东北农业大学，2022：1-7.
［3］王强，王柏柯，刘会芳，等. 蛋白质组学在番茄非生物逆境胁迫中的研究进展［J］. 新疆农业科学，2021，58(10)：1829-1837.
［4］柴畅. 番茄CIPK8基因在低温、盐和干旱胁迫下功能研究［D］. 哈尔滨：东北农业大学，2021：1-8.
［5］Amudha J，Balasubramani G. Recent molecular advances to combat abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants［J］. Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Review，2011，6(2)：31-58.
［6］Ali M，Muhammad I，Haq S V，et al. The CaChiVI2 gene of Capsicum annuum L. confers resistance against heat stress and infection of Phytophthora capsici［J］. Frontiers in Plant Science，2020，11：219-235.
［7］Ahammed G J，Li X，Wan H J，et al. SIWRKY81 reduces drought tolerance by attenuating proline biosynthesis in tomato［J］. Scientia Horticulturae，2020，270：109444.
［8］Jian W，Zheng Y X，Yu T T，et al. SINAC6，a NAC transcription factor，is involved in drought stress response and reproductive process in tomato［J］. Journal of Plant Physiology，2021，264：153483.
［9］Li F F，Chen X Y，Zhou S G，et al. Overexpression of SIMBP22 in tomato affects plant growth and enhances tolerance to drought stress［J］. Plant Science，2020，301：110672.
［10］Liu Y D，Wen L，Shi Y，et al. Stress-responsive tomato gene SIGRAS4 function in drought stress and abscisic acid signaling［J］. Plant Science，2021，304：110804.
［11］Gao Z，Bao Y F，Wang Z Y，et al. Gene silencing of SLZF57 reduces drought stress tolerance in tomato［J］. Plant Cell，Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC)，2022，150(1)：97-104.
［12］Zhao T T，Wu T R，Pei T，et al. Overexpression of SIGATA17 promotes drought tolerance in transgenic tomato plants by enhancing activation of the phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway［J］. Frontiers in Plant Science，2021，12：634888.
［13］Zhao T T，Wang Z Y，Bao Y F，et al. Downregulation of SL-ZH13 transcription factor gene expression decreases drought tolerance of tomato［J］. Journal of Integrative Agriculture，2019，18(7)：1579-1586.
［14］Wang X Y，Liu Y，Li H X，et al. SISNAT2，a chloroplast-localized acetyltransferase，is involved in Rubisco lysine acetylation and negatively regulates drought stress tolerance in tomato［J］. Environmental and Experimental Botany，2022，201：105003.
［15］Mushtaq N，Wang Y，Fan J M，et al. Down-regulation of cytokinin receptor gene SIHK2 improves plant tolerance to drought，heat，and combined stresses in tomato［J］. Plants，2022，11(2)：154-173.
［16］Wu H Q，Liu L，Chen Y F，et al. Tomato SICER1-1 catalyzes the synthesis of wax alkanes，increasing drought tolerance and fruit storability［J］. Horticulture Research，2022，9：uhac004-018.
［17］Liu L，Zhang J L，Xu J Y，et al. CRISPR/Cas9 targeted mutagenesis of SILBD40，a lateral organ boundaries domain transcription factor，enhances drought tolerance in tomato［J］. Plant Science，2020，301：110683.
［18］Li F F，Chen G P，Xie Q L，et al. Down-regulation of SIGT-26 gene confers dwarf plants and enhances drought and salt stress resistance in tomato［J］. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry，2023，203：108053.
［19］Devkar V，Thirumalaikumar V P，Xue G P，et al. Multifaceted regulatory function of tomato SITAF1 in the response to salinity stress［J］. New Phytologist，2020，225(4)：1681-1698.
［20］Meng C，Yang M M，Wang Y X，et al. SIWHY2 interacts with SIRECA2 to maintain mitochondrial function under drought stress in tomato［J］. Plant Science，2020，301：110674.
［21］Zhao S S，Zhang Q K，Liu M Y，et al. Regulation of plant responses to salt stress［J］. International Journal of Molecular Sciences，2021，22(9)：4609-4615.
［22］Hasanuzzaman M，Fujita M. Plant responses and tolerance to salt stress：physiological and molecular interventions［J］. International Journal of Molecular Sciences，2022，23(9)：4810-4816.
［23］Tanveer K，Gilani S，Hussain Z，et al. Effect of salt stress on tomato plant and the role of calcium［J］. Journal of Plant Nutrition，2020，43(1)：28-35.
［24］Ors S，Ekinci M，Yildirim E，et al. Interactive effects of salinity and drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and physiology of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) seedlings［J］. South African Journal of Botany，2021，137：335-339.
［25］Xu Z J，Wang F，Ma Y B，et al. Transcription factor SIAREB1 is involved in the antioxidant regulation under saline–alkaline stress in tomato［J］. Antioxidants，2022，11(9)：1673-1688.
［26］Wang W R，Liang J H，Wang G F，et al. Overexpression of PpSnRK1α in tomato enhanced salt tolerance by regulating ABA signaling pathway and reactive oxygen metabolism［J］. BMC Plant Biology，2020，20(1)：128.
［27］Zhu M K，Chen G P，Zhang J L，et al. The abiotic stress-responsive NAC-type transcription factor SINAC4 regulates salt and drought tolerance and stress-related genes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)［J］. Plant Cell Reports，2014，33(11)：1851-1863.
［28］Gao Y F，Liu J K，Yang F M，et al. The WRKY transcription factor WRKY8 promotes resistance to pathogen infection and mediates drought and salt stress tolerance in Solanum lycopersicum［J］. Physiologia Plantarum，2020，168(1)：98-117.
［29］Wang Z，Hong Y C，Li Y M，et al. Natural variations in SISOS1 contribute to the loss of salt tolerance during tomato domestication［J］. Plant Biotechnology Journal，2021，19(1)：20-22.
［30］Shu P，Li Y J，Li Z Y，et al. SIMAPK3 enhances tolerance to salt stress in tomato plants by scavenging ROS accumulation and up-regulating the expression of ethylene signaling related genes［J］. Environmental and Experimental Botany，2022，193：104698.
［31］Jia C G，Zhao S T，Bao T T，et al. Tomato BZR/BES transcription factor SIBZR1 positively regulates BR signaling and salt stress tolerance in tomato and Arabidopsis［J］. Plant Science，2021，302：110719.
［32］Meng X Q，Cai J，Deng L，et al. SISTE1 promotes abscisic acid-dependent salt stress-responsive pathways via improving ion homeostasis and reactive oxygen species scavenging in tomato［J］. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology，2020，62(12)：1942-1966.
［33］Chen Y N，Li L，Tang B Y，et al. Silencing of SIMYB55 affects plant flowering and enhances tolerance to drought and salt stress in tomato［J］. Plant Science，2022，316：111166.
［34］Guo J E，Wang H H，Yang Y，et al. Histone deacetylase gene SIHDA3 is involved in drought and salt response in tomato［J］. Plant Growth Regulation，2023，99(2)：359-372.
［35］Zhou R，Kong L P，Wu Z，et al. Physiological response of tomatoes at drought，heat and their combination followed by recovery［J］. Physiologia Plantarum，2019，165(2)：144-154.
［36］Beena R. Research paradigm and inference of studies on high temperature stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.)［J］. Adv Plant Physiology，2013，14：497-511.
［37］Vijayakumar A，Shaji S，Beena R，et al. High temperature induced changes in quality and yield parameters of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and similarity coefficients among genotypes using SSR markers［J］. Heliyon，2021，7(2)：e05988.
［38］段金虎，姜悦畅，韩菲，等. 高温胁迫对番茄苗期光合色素的影响［J］. 中国果菜，2023，43(10)：47-52.
［39］Zhuang K Y，Gao Y Y，Liu Z B，et al. WHIRLY1 regulates HSP21.5A expression to promote thermotolerance in tomato［J］. Plant & Cell Physiology，2020，61(1)：169-177.
［40］Mao L Z，Deng M H，Jiang S R，et al. Characterization of the DREBA4-Type transcription factor (SIDREBA4)，which contributes to heat tolerance in tomatoes［J］. Frontiers in Plant Science，2020，11：554520.
［41］Xu X，Wang Q，Li W Q，et al. Overexpression of SIBBX17 affects plant growth and enhances heat tolerance in tomato［J］. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules，2022，206：799-811.
［42］Zhang S，Chen C，Dai S S，et al. A tomato putative metalloprotease SIEGY2 plays a positive role in thermotolerance［J］. Agriculture，2022，12(7)：940-952.
［43］Hu Z J，Li J X，Ding S T，et al. The protein kinase CPK28 phosphorylates ascorbate peroxidase and enhances thermotolerance in tomato［J］. Plant Physiology，2021，186(2)：1302-1317.
［44］Wang X Y，Zhang H J，Xie Q，et al. SISNAT interacts with HSP40，a molecular chaperone，to regulate melatonin biosynthesis and promote thermotolerance in tomato［J］. Plant Cell Physiology，2020，61(5)：909-921.
［45］Zhang Y，Song H H，Wang X Y，et al. The roles of different types of trichomes in tomato resistance to cold，drought，whiteflies，and Botrytis［J］. Agronomy Journal，2020，10(3)：411-427.
［46］吴宇欣，蔡昌杨，唐诗蓓，等. 植物响应低温的生长发育及分子机制研究进展［J］. 江苏农业科学，2023，51(19)：1-9.
［47］Mesa T，Polo J，Arabia A，et al. Differential physiological response to heat and cold stress of tomato plants and its implication on fruit quality［J］. Journal of Plant Physiology，2022，268：153581.
［48］Wang M L，Hao J，Chen X H，et al. SlMYB102 expression enhances low-temperature stress resistance in tomato plants［J］. PeerJ，2020，8：e10059.
［49］Min D D，Zhou J X，Li J Z，et al. SlMYC2 targeted regulation of polyamines biosynthesis contributes to methyl jasmonate-induced chilling tolerance in tomato fruit［J］. Postharvest Biology and Technology，2021，174：111443.
［50］Zhuang K Y，Wang J Y，Jiao B Z，et al. WHIRLY1 maintains leaf photosynthetic capacity in tomato by regulating the expression of RbcS1 under chilling stress［J］. Journal of Experimental Botany，2020，71(12)：3653-3663.
［51］Wang F，Wang X J，Zhang Y，et al. SIFHY3 and SlHY5 act compliantly to enhance cold tolerance through the integration of myo-inositol and light signaling in tomato［J］. New Phytologist，2022，233(5)：2127-2143.
［52］Yang D Y，Li M，Ma N N，et al. Tomato SIGGP-LIKE gene participates in plant responses to chilling stress and pathogenic infection［J］. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry，2017，112：218-226.
［53］Hu T X，Wang S F，Wang Q，et al. A tomato dynein light chain gene SILC6D is a negative regulator of chilling stress［J］. Plant Science，2021(303)：110753.
［54］Zhang L Y，Jiang X C，Liu Q Y，et al. The HY5 and MYB15 transcription factors positively regulate cold tolerance in tomato via the CBF pathway［J］. Plant Cell and Environment，2020，43(11)：2712-2726.
［55］Ma X，Gai W X，Li Y，et al. The CBL-interacting protein kinase CaCIPK13 positively regulates defence mechanisms against cold stress in pepper［J］. Journal of Experimental Botany，2022，73(5)：1655-1667.
［56］Han N N，Fan S Y，Zhang T T，et al. SIHY5 is a necessary regulator of the cold acclimation response in tomato［J］. Plant Growth Regulation，2020，91(1)：1-12.
［57］周明，李常保. 我国番茄种业发展现状及展望［J］. 蔬菜，2022(5)：6-10.
［58］Sun C L，Deng L，Du M M，et al. A transcriptional network promotes anthocyanin biosynthesis in tomato flesh［J］. Molecular Plant，2020，13(1)：42-58.
［59］Krishna R，Ansari W A，Soumia P S，et al. Biotechnological interventions in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) for drought stress tolerance：achievements and future prospects［J］Biotechnology，2022，11(4)：48-70.

相似文献/References:

[1]何从亮,毛久庚,甘小虎,等.玻璃温室番茄长季节基质袋栽培技术[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(04):158.
[2]李永灿,余文贵,陈怀谷,等.番茄灰霉病菌产毒条件优化[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(05):94.
　Li Yongcan,et al.Optimization of toxigenic conditions of tomato Botrytis cinerea[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2013,41(4):94.
[3]赵秋月,甘潇,张广臣.Na2CO3胁迫对番茄幼苗生长的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(05):128.
　Zhao Qiuyue,et al.Effect of Na2CO3 stress on growth of tomato seedlings[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2013,41(4):128.
[4]耿德刚,徐俊伟,戈振超,等.温室大棚番茄滴灌试验研究及效益分析[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(05):132.
　Geng Degang,et al.Drip irrigation experimental and benefit analysis on greenhouse tomato[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2013,41(4):132.
[5]杜中平,聂书明.不同配方基质对番茄生长特性、光合特性及产量的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(05):138.
　Du Zhongping,et al.Effects of different substrates on growth，photosynthetic characteristics and yield of tomato[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2013,41(4):138.
[6]赵河,毛秀杰,叶景学.抗叶霉病不同基因型番茄的光合特性[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(11):185.
　Zhao He,et al(8).Photosynthetic characteristics of different genotypes of tomato with resistance to leaf mold[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(4):185.
[7]陈素娟,孙娜娜.不同基质配比对番茄秧苗生长的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(06):128.
　Chen Sujuan,et al.Effect of different substrate compositions on growth of tomato seedling[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2013,41(4):128.
[8]孙禛禛,吴秋霞,温新宇,等.转反义LetAPX基因番茄抗氧化酶活性在苗期、花期、果期的变化[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(12):188.
　Sun Zhenzhen,et al.Study on antioxidant enzymes activity during seedling，flowering and fruiting of tomato with antisense LetAPX gene[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2015,43(4):188.
[9]李晓慧,张恩让,何玉安,等.亚高温及外源物质调节下番茄的生理响应[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(07):135.
　Li Xiaohui,et al.Physiological response of tomato under the regulation of sub-high temperature and exogenous substances[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2013,41(4):135.
[10]李建宏,张楠,张泽,等.番茄红素提取与测定方法的优化[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(08):259.
　Li Jianhong,et al.Optimization of lycopene extraction and determination method[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2013,41(4):259.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2024-05-13
基金项目：国家自然科学基金(编号：32302542)；河北省自然科学基金(编号：C2024402002)；河北省高等学校科学技术研究项目(编号：QN2022062)；河北省现代农业产业体系创新团队建设项目(编号：HBCT2024140206)。
作者简介：郑亚妮(1997—)，女，河北邯郸人，硕士研究生，主要从事蔬菜抗逆机制研究。E-mail：15032007273@163.com。
通信作者：王星，博士，讲师，硕士生导师，主要从事蔬菜遗传育种及高效栽培研究。E-mail：wangxing@hebeu.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-02-20