|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]闫宁,战宇,谢昊臻,等.不同改土方式对连作人参生长发育的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2022,50(6):120-125.
 Yan Ning,et al.Influences of different soil improvement methods on growth of continuous cropping ginseng[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2022,50(6):120-125.
点击复制

不同改土方式对连作人参生长发育的影响(PDF)
分享到:

《江苏农业科学》[ISSN:1002-1302/CN:32-1214/S]

卷:
第50卷
期数:
2022年第6期
页码:
120-125
栏目:
园艺与林学
出版日期:
2022-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Influences of different soil improvement methods on growth of continuous cropping ginseng
作者:
闫宁 战宇 谢昊臻 陈长宝 李琼
长春中医药大学吉林省人参科学研究院,吉林长春 130117
Author(s):
Yan Ninget al
关键词:
人参连作障碍强还原土壤灭菌熏蒸土壤改良
Keywords:
-
分类号:
S567.5+10.4
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探究不同改良土壤方式对连作人参生长发育的影响,于吉林省吉林市昌邑区左家镇北方药用植物资源圃进行大田试验,设老参地土壤为对照(CK),研究强还原土壤灭菌加熏蒸(RSD+SF)、强还原土壤灭菌加复合菌(RSD+F)、熏蒸加复合菌(SF+F)3种处理对人参生长发育、生理抗性、根系活力、发病及地下生长情况的影响。结果表明,3种改土方式对人参的生长发育均有一定的促进作用。其中,RSD+SF组的人参根长、根粗、须根数、干质量和湿质量均明显优于其他处理组,但是,人参的折干率表现为RSD+F组显著高于其他处理组;此外,3种处理的人参MDA含量差异不显著(P>0.05),但是SOD和CAT活性差异显著,表现为RSD+F组人参的SOD及CAT活性最强,SF+F组人参的SOD活性最低,为186.70 U/g,RSD+SF组人参的CAT活性最低,为122.89 U/g;同时,RSD+F组人参根系活力最强,为99.53 mg/(g·h),其次为SF+F组,根系活力为61.90 mg/(g·h),RSD+SF组根系活力最弱,为54.42 mg/(g·h);RSD+SF组人参发病率最低,仅为23.3%,其次是SF+F组,RSD+F组人参发病率最高(35%);3种处理下的人参病情严重情况无显著性差异(P>0.05),SF+F组人参地下根部长势最好且无病斑,RSD+SF组人参地下部分长势良好,个别人参出现病斑,而RSD+F组人参地下生长受抑制,须根数明显减少,且6株人参均出现病斑。由此可知,RSD+SF及SF+F改良连作人参土壤的效果要优于RSD+F组的改良效果,并能更好地促进人参的生长发育。
Abstract:
-

参考文献/References:

[1]王荣. 中药饮片人参成分及药理作用的研究讨论[J]. 北方药学,2019,16(9):194-195.
[2]王玲玲. 人参连作障碍影响因素及土壤改良技术研究[D]. 烟台:烟台大学,2016.
[3]陈长宝,张瑞,王恩鹏,等. 人参化感作用及其研究进展[J]. 特产研究,2018,40(1):54-58.
[4]刘莹,孙文松,李玲,等. 人参连作障碍及防治措施研究进展[J]. 园艺与种苗,2020,40(7):26-29.
[5]蔡祖聪,张金波,黄新琦,等. 强还原土壤灭菌防控作物土传病的应用研究[J]. 土壤学报,2015,52(3):469-476.
[6]Huang B,Li J,Wang Q A,et al. Effect of soil fumigants on degradation of abamectin and their combination synergistic effect to root-knot nematode[J]. PLoS One,2018,13(6):e0188245.
[7]Yu J L,Sharpe S M,Boyd N S.Long-term effect of fumigation and a Sorghum cover crop on broadleaf and grass weeds in plastic-mulched tomato[J]. Pest Management Science,2021,77(4):1806-1817.
[8]刘洋. 氯化苦消毒对三七土壤微生物群落的影响[D]. 昆明:昆明理工大学,2018.
[9]Fang W S,Yan D D,Huang B,et al. Biochemical pathways used by microorganisms to produce nitrous oxide emissions from soils fumigated with dimethyl disulfide or allyl isothiocyanate[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2019,132:1-13.
[10]Li J,Huang B,Wang Q X,et al. Effects of fumigation with metam-sodium on soil microbial biomass,respiration,nitrogen transformation,bacterial community diversity and genes encoding key enzymes involved in nitrogen cycling[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2017,598:1027-1036.
[11]徐彬,徐健,祁建杭,等. 枯草芽孢杆菌1013对连作障碍土壤的改良及对番茄的促生作用[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2021,42(2):111-116.
[12]谢奎忠,胡新元,张彤彤,等. 不同杀菌剂对旱地连作马铃薯土壤水分效应、微生物和产量的影响[J]. 草业学报,2019,28(7):103-111.
[13]Compant S,Clément C,Sessitsch A.Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo-and endosphere of plants:their role,colonization,mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2010,42(5):669-678.
[14]欧小宏,刘迪秋,王麟猛,等. 土壤熏蒸处理对连作三七生长发育及土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 中国现代中药,2018,20(7):842-849.
[15]高原,丁万隆,龙期良,等. 人参锈腐菌Cylindrocarpon destructans侵染对人参生理指标的影响[J]. 中国现代中药,2016,18(1):88-91,96.
[16]Rahman M,Punja Z K.Factors influencing development of root rot on ginseng caused by Cylindrocarpon destructans[J]. Phytopathology,2005,95(12):1381-1390.
[17]杨婷. 膜脂过氧化对植物细胞的伤害[J]. 科技与创新,2018(8):61-62.
[18]Cai Z C,Liu X H,Chen H A,et al. Variations in morphology,physiology,and multiple bioactive constituents of Lonicerae Japonicae Flos under salt stress[J]. Scientific Reports,2021,11:3939.
[19]赵晓萌,张雪松,祁建军,等. 连作对西洋参根系生长及酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报,2009,25(13):103-107.
[20]刘亮亮,黄新琦,朱睿,等. 强还原土壤对尖孢镰刀菌的抑制及微生物区系的影响[J]. 土壤,2016,48(1):88-94.
[21]李云龙. 三七化感作用及其微生物学消减机制[D]. 南京:南京师范大学,2020.
[22]田给林.连作草莓土壤酚酸类物质的化感作用及其生物调控研究[D]. 北京:中国农业大学,2015.
[23]Cheng H Y,Zhang D Q,Ren L R,et al. Bio-activation of soil with beneficial microbes after soil fumigation reduces soil-borne pathogens and increases tomato yield[J]. Environmental Pollution,2021,283:117160.
[24]张志刚,李一帆,朱丹,等. 人参对脊髓损伤大鼠MDA、SOD、NO含量的影响及意义[J]. 中风与神经疾病杂志,2014,31(12):1097-1099.
[25]王韶娟. 人参根系分泌物对植物生长的影响及参后地植物修复[D]. 长春:吉林农业大学,2008.
[26]张淋淋,孙海,于红霞,等. 水分胁迫对西洋参叶片生理生化指标的影响[J]. 吉林农业大学学报,2020,42(4):403-408.
[27]董亮,何永志,王远亮,等. 超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)的应用研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2013,15(5):53-58.
[28]张亚玉,李晓明,郭靖,等. 人参、西洋参根系活力的初步研究[J]. 吉林农业大学学报,1996,18(2):83-85.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵权.嘧环·咯菌腈在人参中的消解动态及最终残留[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(10):283.
 Zhao Quan.Degradation dynamics and final residues of cyprodinil·fludioxonil in ginseng[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(6):283.
[2]张永平,乔永旭,赵绪明,等.蚯蚓粪作基肥对夏播花生生长与产量的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(08):97.
 Zhang Yongping,et al.Effects of vermicompost as basal fertilizer on growth and yield of summer-sowing peanut[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(6):97.
[3]何天久,吴巧玉,曾宪浩,等.马铃薯连作障碍形成机制与调控措施研究进展[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(04):1.
 He Tianjiu,et al.Research progress on formation mechanism and control measures of potato continuous cropping obstacle[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2016,44(6):1.
[4]曹国璠,赵凯.不同连作障碍防控技术组合对太子参主要经济性状的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(03):194.
 Cao Guofan,et al.Effects of different technology combinations for prevention and control of cropping obstacles on main economic characters of Pseudostellaria heterophylla[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(6):194.
[5]金建丽,杨春文,石兰英,等.人参地土壤的酶活性[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(03):333.
 Jin Jianli,et al.Enzymatic activity of ginseng land soil[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(6):333.
[6]张鸿雁,刘勇,任勇洋.人参锈腐病及疫病生防放线菌筛选[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(02):173.
 Zhang Hongyan,et al.Screening of bio-control actinomyces of ginseng rust rot and blight[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2016,44(6):173.
[7]曹国璠,赵凯.不同连作障碍防控技术组合对太子参主要农艺性状的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(04):183.
 Cao Guofan,et al.Effects of different prevention and control combinations of continuous cropping obstacle on main agronomic traits of Pseudostellaria heterophylla[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(6):183.
[8]李娟,申军艳,陈枫,等.2种乙烯抑制剂对连作地黄生长的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(10):332.
 Li Juan,et al.Effect of two ethylene inhibitors on growth of continuous cropping Rehmannia glutinosa[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2015,43(6):332.
[9]张涛,韩梅,刘翠晶,等.人参总RNA提取方法及反转录酶的比较[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(08):34.
 Zhang Tao,et al.Comparative study on extraction methods of total RNA from ginseng and inverse transcriptases[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2015,43(6):34.
[10]苏卫国,郭军,郑佳秋,等.西瓜与水生蔬菜水旱轮作模式栽培技术要点[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(06):205.
 Su Weiguo,et al.Cultivation techniques of upland rotation mode of watermelon and aquatic vegetables[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(6):205.
[11]战宇,苗馨月,王二刚,等.灭菌方式对人参连作土壤养分及真菌群落结构的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2024,52(2):235.
 Zhan Yu,et al.Effects of disinfestation methods on soil nutrients and fungal community structure of ginseng continuous cropping[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2024,52(6):235.
[12]刘莹,孙文松,李玲,等.不同农业改良措施对老参地土壤酶活性及微生物群落的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2024,52(6):235.
 Liu Ying,et al.Effects of different agricultural improvement measures on soil enzyme activities and microbial community in old ginseng field[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2024,52(6):235.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-06-16
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(编号:82073969);吉林省重大科技专项(编号:20200504003YY);吉林省科技发展计划(编号:20190201297JC);吉林省自然科学基金(编号:YDZJ202101ZYTS015)。
作者简介:闫宁(1997—),女,吉林农安人,硕士研究生,研究方向为生药学。E-mail:3355316860@qq.com。
通信作者:李琼,助理研究员,主要从事药用植物与栽培研究。E-mail:wode17k@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-03-20