|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈露,胡浩,戈阳,等.交易费用、社会资本与生猪销售渠道选择——基于江苏省养殖户的调查[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(06):311-316.
 Chen Lu,et al.Transaction cost,social capital and pig sales channel choice—Based on a survey of farmers in Jiangsu Province[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2020,48(06):311-316.
点击复制

交易费用、社会资本与生猪销售渠道选择
——基于江苏省养殖户的调查
(PDF)
分享到:

《江苏农业科学》[ISSN:1002-1302/CN:32-1214/S]

卷:
第48卷
期数:
2020年第06期
页码:
311-316
栏目:
农业经济与管理
出版日期:
2020-04-08

文章信息/Info

Title:
Transaction cost,social capital and pig sales channel choice—Based on a survey of farmers in Jiangsu Province
作者:
陈露 胡浩 戈阳 江光辉
南京农业大学经济管理学院,江苏南京 210095
Author(s):
Chen Luet al
关键词:
交易费用社会资本销售渠道有序Probit模型生猪销售
Keywords:
-
分类号:
F323.7
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
生猪产业涉及生猪的饲养、流通、加工、销售等环节,销售作为生猪产业链的基本环节之一,在生猪产业的发展中起着至关重要的作用。基于江苏省245户养殖户的调查数据,采用有序Probit模型,分别从信息成本、谈判成本、执行成本、社会网络、社会信任、社会声望及社会参与等7个方面,对生猪流通中交易费用与社会资本对养殖户生猪销售渠道选择的影响进行研究。结果表明,信息成本、执行成本与谈判成本对养殖户生猪销售渠道选择的影响比较显著,社会网络、社会信任和社会参与的影响也很明显;此外,养殖户的年龄、文化程度也会影响生猪销售渠道的选择。
Abstract:
-

参考文献/References:

[1]中华人民共和国国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴(2008,2018)[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社,2008,2018.
[2]国家统计局农村社会经济调查司. 中国农村统计年鉴(2008、2018)[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社,2008,2018.
[3]Coase R H. The nature of the firm[J]. Economica,1937,4(16):386-405.
[4]Arrow K J. The organization of economic activity:issues pertinent to the choice of marketversus nonmarket allocation[J]. The Analysis and Evaluation of Publicexpenditure(the PPB System),1969,3(1):59-73.
[5]Williamson E O.The economic institutions of capitalism[M]. New York:the Free Press,1985:235-258.
[6]布尔迪厄. 文化资本与社会炼金术——布尔迪厄访谈录[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社,1997:189-193.
[7]Coleman J. The Foundations of social theory[M]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1990:304-318.
[8]Putnam R D,Leonardi R,Nanetti R Y. Making democracy work:civic institution in modern Italy,Princeton[M]. Princeton:Princeton University Press,1993:258.
[9]Hobbs J E. Measuring the importance of transaction costs in cattle marketing[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1997,79(4):1083-1095.
[10]Lapar M L,Holloway G,Ehui S. Policy options promoting market participation among smallholder livestock producers:a case study from the Phillipines[J]. Food Policy,2003,28(3):187-211.
[11]Alene A D,Manyong V M,Omanya G,et al. Smallholder market participation under transactions costs:maize supply and fertilizer demand in Kenya[J]. Food Policy,2008,33(4):318-328.
[12]屈小博,霍学喜. 交易成本对农户农产品销售行为的影响——基于陕西省6个县27个村果农调查数据的分析[J]. 中国农村经济,2007(8):35-46.
[13]宋金田,祁春节. 交易成本对农户农产品销售方式选择的影响——基于对柑橘种植农户的调查[J]. 中国农村观察,2011(5):33-44,96.
[14]Rauch J,Casella A. Overcoming informational barriers to international resource allocation:prices and group ties[J]. Economic Journal,2001,113(484):21-42.
[15]Fafchamps M,Minten B. Returns to social network capital among traders[J]. Oxford Economic Papers,2002,54:173-206.
[16]Maula M,Autio E,Murray G. Prerequisites for the creation of social capitaland subsequent knowledge acquisition in corporate venture capital[J]. Venture Capital,2003,5:117-134.
[17]李后建. 市场化、社会资本与农户多元化经营[J]. 农业技术经济,2014(1):99-110.
[18]蔡荣,韩洪云. 交易成本对农户垂直协作方式选择的影响——基于山东省苹果种植户的调查数据[J]. 财贸经济,2011(7):103-109.
[19]唐立强. 农户社会资本与电商交易平台的选择[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,16(4):75-86.
[20]张聪颖,霍学喜. 社会资本多维视角与农户销售渠道选择——基于微观调研数据的实证[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017(1):23-31,141.

相似文献/References:

[1]郭斌,李伟.基于交易效率的农地流入方交易费用研究[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(02):363.
 Guo Bin,et al.Study on transaction cost of farmland inflow side based on transaction efficiency[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(06):363.
[2]张洪霞.人力资本、社会资本对新生代农民工市民化的影响——基于797位农民工的实证调查[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(02):372.
 Zhang Hongxia,et al.Effects of human capital and social capital on citizenization of new generation of migrant workers—Based on empirical investigation of 797 migrant workers[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(06):372.
[3]唐瑭,胡浩.收入冲击、社会资本与农户消费信贷行为——基于CFPS数据的实证分析[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(04):514.
 Tang Tang,et al.Income shocks, social capital and farmers consumer credit behavior—An empirical analysis based on CFPS data[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2016,44(06):514.
[4]孟潇,张红丽.交易费用视角下的农资流通模式比较分析[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(04):413.
 Meng Xiao,et al.Comparative study on agricultural circulation pattern from perspective of transaction cost[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2014,42(06):413.
[5]朱婷婷,谭涛.村两委负责人社会资本差异对农村发展水平的影响——基于江苏省262个村庄的实证分析[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(07):308.
 Zhu Tingting,et al.Effect of social capital difference of heads of village committees on rural development level:Empirical analysis based on data of 262 villages in Jiangsu Province[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2017,45(06):308.
[6]何军,祝丽琴.土地流转中契约期限的选择:长期还是短期?——基于湖北省孝昌县的实证分析[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(08):320.
 He Jun,et al.Choice of contract term in land transfer:long-term or short-term?—Based on empirical analysis of Xiaochang,Hubei Province[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2018,46(06):320.
[7]杨桂林,杨柳,焦洪赞,等.基于地理加权回归模型的村域致贫因子研究——以贵州省剑河县为例[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(10):324.
 Yang Guilin,et al.Study on poverty factors in villages based on geographic weighted regression model—Taking Jianhe County of Guizhou Province as an example[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2018,46(06):324.
[8]黄武,赵桐庆,佟大建.多技术视角下农户环境友好型农业技术采纳[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(14):329.
 Huang Wu,et al.Farmers adoption of environment-friendly agricultural technologies from perspective of multi-technology[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2018,46(06):329.
[9]陈艳,刘志凌.社会资本参与乡村振兴战略的培育路径探索——江苏杉荷园农业科技发展有限公司案例[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(21):341.
 Chen Yan,et al.Cultivation path exploration on social capitals participation in rural revitalization strategy—Taking Jiangsu Shanhe Garden Agricultural Science and Technology Development Co. Ltd as an example[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2018,46(06):341.
[10]苏群,仲漫.社会资本视角下父母外出与儿童的自我效能——基于倾向得分匹配法的分析[J].江苏农业科学,2019,47(05):311.
 Su Qun,et al.Parental outing and childrens self-efficacy from perspective of social capital—Analysis based on propensity score matching method[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2019,47(06):311.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-10-18
基金项目:国家社会科学基金(编号:19AGL020);江苏现代农业(生猪)产业技术体系产业经济研究项目(编号:JATS[2018]294);江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(编号:PAPD)。
作者简介:陈露(1994—),女,重庆秀山人,硕士研究生,主要从事畜牧业经济研究。E-mail:1807649413@qq.com。
通信作者:胡浩,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事农业经济及畜牧业经济研究。E-mail:huhao@njau.edu.c
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-03-20